<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Netregistry Blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.netregistry.com.au/blog/comments/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.netregistry.com.au/blog</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 07:02:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Practical considerations for owners of new .brand Top Level Domains (TLDs) by jaffa</title>
		<link>http://www.netregistry.com.au/blog/domains/practical-considerations-for-owners-of-new-brand-top-level-domains-tlds#comment-9829</link>
		<dc:creator>jaffa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 07:02:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.netregistry.com.au/blog/?p=1761#comment-9829</guid>
		<description>Great blog.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great blog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The value of keywords and selecting the right ones by John</title>
		<link>http://www.netregistry.com.au/blog/seo/the-value-of-keywords-and-selecting-the-right-ones#comment-9828</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 06:02:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.netregistry.com.au/blog/?p=1756#comment-9828</guid>
		<description>Please help me with keywords</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please help me with keywords</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Google Gets Suggestive by Melisa Foan</title>
		<link>http://www.netregistry.com.au/blog/seo/google-gets-suggestive#comment-9819</link>
		<dc:creator>Melisa Foan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2012 09:23:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.netregistry.com.au/blog/?p=320#comment-9819</guid>
		<description>very nice article, I have been trying to look for this. Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>very nice article, I have been trying to look for this. Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why duping content is a big no no by James</title>
		<link>http://www.netregistry.com.au/blog/seo/why-duping-content-is-a-big-no-no#comment-9538</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 22:13:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.netregistry.com.au/blog/?p=1687#comment-9538</guid>
		<description>Ok cool sounds like this canonical meta tag is about to become my new best friend:)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok cool sounds like this canonical meta tag is about to become my new best friend:)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why duping content is a big no no by Clancy Clarke</title>
		<link>http://www.netregistry.com.au/blog/seo/why-duping-content-is-a-big-no-no#comment-9535</link>
		<dc:creator>Clancy Clarke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 21:34:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.netregistry.com.au/blog/?p=1687#comment-9535</guid>
		<description>Unfortunately not that I am aware of. There are probably paid tools that will provide you a percentage of duplicate content from page to page - but no free tools I can think of. 

Another easy way to check for duplicate content is to grab a fairly large chunk of text from one of your pages and do a Google search with quotes around that chunk. In theory your website should rank number 1, but if it doesn&#039;t and others appear above it - then there is a chance that these pages have &quot;scraped&quot; your content. If this is the case, it&#039;s time to re-write.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unfortunately not that I am aware of. There are probably paid tools that will provide you a percentage of duplicate content from page to page &#8211; but no free tools I can think of. </p>
<p>Another easy way to check for duplicate content is to grab a fairly large chunk of text from one of your pages and do a Google search with quotes around that chunk. In theory your website should rank number 1, but if it doesn&#8217;t and others appear above it &#8211; then there is a chance that these pages have &#8220;scraped&#8221; your content. If this is the case, it&#8217;s time to re-write.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why duping content is a big no no by Clancy Clarke</title>
		<link>http://www.netregistry.com.au/blog/seo/why-duping-content-is-a-big-no-no#comment-9534</link>
		<dc:creator>Clancy Clarke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 21:31:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.netregistry.com.au/blog/?p=1687#comment-9534</guid>
		<description>Hi James, 

This is also true - by duplicating content across several pages on your websites you are not providing the user with any additional / useful information. Small blocks of text that might be helpful on every single page, such as your contact details are fine but larger blocks can cause problems. If you think it would be useful to provide a Return Policy for example on every page it&#039;s probably best to do this using a link that will open the Returns Policy in a new window. This means the Returns Policy page remains as a single page which isn&#039;t duplicated and the other pages simply link to it. 

I&#039;ve talked a lot about the canonical meta tag in some of the responses below - the reason being that is probably the single most important tool that web master have to prevent duplicate content penalties, not only accross multiple domain names but also in a single site. Google release a blog post when the canonical meta tag was first release which explains how to use it. 

http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com.au/2009/02/specify-your-canonical.html

It explains how the tag can be useful for a site that may display the same content on several different URLs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi James, </p>
<p>This is also true &#8211; by duplicating content across several pages on your websites you are not providing the user with any additional / useful information. Small blocks of text that might be helpful on every single page, such as your contact details are fine but larger blocks can cause problems. If you think it would be useful to provide a Return Policy for example on every page it&#8217;s probably best to do this using a link that will open the Returns Policy in a new window. This means the Returns Policy page remains as a single page which isn&#8217;t duplicated and the other pages simply link to it. </p>
<p>I&#8217;ve talked a lot about the canonical meta tag in some of the responses below &#8211; the reason being that is probably the single most important tool that web master have to prevent duplicate content penalties, not only accross multiple domain names but also in a single site. Google release a blog post when the canonical meta tag was first release which explains how to use it. </p>
<p><a href="http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com.au/2009/02/specify-your-canonical.html" rel="nofollow">http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com.au/2009/02/specify-your-canonical.html</a></p>
<p>It explains how the tag can be useful for a site that may display the same content on several different URLs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why duping content is a big no no by James</title>
		<link>http://www.netregistry.com.au/blog/seo/why-duping-content-is-a-big-no-no#comment-9533</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 21:20:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.netregistry.com.au/blog/?p=1687#comment-9533</guid>
		<description>I was told that duplicate content WITHIN the same site can also be bad. 

E.g. if you have a &quot;Brand Overview&quot; for all products of that same brand. 

Or you have a &quot;Return Policy&quot; block of text for all products across the site. 

Is this true?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was told that duplicate content WITHIN the same site can also be bad. </p>
<p>E.g. if you have a &#8220;Brand Overview&#8221; for all products of that same brand. </p>
<p>Or you have a &#8220;Return Policy&#8221; block of text for all products across the site. </p>
<p>Is this true?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why duping content is a big no no by Clancy Clarke</title>
		<link>http://www.netregistry.com.au/blog/seo/why-duping-content-is-a-big-no-no#comment-9521</link>
		<dc:creator>Clancy Clarke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 03:52:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.netregistry.com.au/blog/?p=1687#comment-9521</guid>
		<description>Hi Daniel, 

This is a similar issue with the magazine style websites references above. The best way to achieve this is to place a canonical meta tag in the head content of the page with the duplicate content. The canonical meta tag references the original source of the content and Google recognises this. 

Unfortunately this content that you have added to your websites is not going to give your site any SEO benefit because Google will give that benefit to the site referenced in the canonical meta tag. If you choose to omit the canonical meta tag then you will likely be penalised for duplicating the content. 

I posted a link elsewhere in the comments to an SEOmoz article that references the use of the canonical tag. 

Cheers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Daniel, </p>
<p>This is a similar issue with the magazine style websites references above. The best way to achieve this is to place a canonical meta tag in the head content of the page with the duplicate content. The canonical meta tag references the original source of the content and Google recognises this. </p>
<p>Unfortunately this content that you have added to your websites is not going to give your site any SEO benefit because Google will give that benefit to the site referenced in the canonical meta tag. If you choose to omit the canonical meta tag then you will likely be penalised for duplicating the content. </p>
<p>I posted a link elsewhere in the comments to an SEOmoz article that references the use of the canonical tag. </p>
<p>Cheers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why duping content is a big no no by Daniel Oyston</title>
		<link>http://www.netregistry.com.au/blog/seo/why-duping-content-is-a-big-no-no#comment-9520</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Oyston</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 03:45:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.netregistry.com.au/blog/?p=1687#comment-9520</guid>
		<description>What&#039;s the best approach for re-posting an article or blog from another site? We intend to ramp up our content marketing and publishing content that our partners have already published on their own site seems legitimate to me because it&#039;s valuable to our own clients but how do I not get penalised?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What&#8217;s the best approach for re-posting an article or blog from another site? We intend to ramp up our content marketing and publishing content that our partners have already published on their own site seems legitimate to me because it&#8217;s valuable to our own clients but how do I not get penalised?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why duping content is a big no no by James</title>
		<link>http://www.netregistry.com.au/blog/seo/why-duping-content-is-a-big-no-no#comment-9518</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 23:02:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.netregistry.com.au/blog/?p=1687#comment-9518</guid>
		<description>Do you know if there is something like http://www.copyscape.com but scans the entire website, not page by page?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you know if there is something like <a href="http://www.copyscape.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.copyscape.com</a> but scans the entire website, not page by page?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

