Advanced Search
Don’t Be Evil, Google
By Tim Dean | Published  26/Oct/2006 | | Rating:
Page 1/1

Don't Be Evil, Google

by Tim Dean, PC Authority

And I quote: ‘Corporations which provide Internet searching, chat, publishing or other services should make an effort to ensure that they respect the rights of their clients to use the Internet without interference.’ This quote comes from a joint declaration between the United Nations, the Organization of American States and the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe and was signed only in December last year.

Yet I wonder whether that was too late for Google to give it a good read and ponder its significance?

The launch of Google’s official portal for mainland China, google.cn, has received a lot of attention recently. Not surprisingly, in order to earn the Chinese government’s stamp of approval, Google had to employ some fairly striking censorship to its results. Sites covering the Tiananmen Square protests of 1989, the Dalai Lama, the Falun Gong and many European and American news sites just don’t rank when you search using google.cn. This is clearly censorship that we would not tolerate if it were to take place in Australia. However, should we tolerate it if it’s happening in a foreign country? This is not an easy question to answer.

Google is quite within its rights as a company to conduct its business in any way it pleases as long as it doesn’t contravene any local or international laws. In fact, Google couldn’t operate in China if it didn’t respect the local laws. This raises the question of whether Google should do business in China at all.

Just because a business can do something legally doesn’t mean it will or that it should. Hence, Google’s own motto: ‘Don’t be evil’. From the outset, Google branded itself as a company that did things because it thought they were the right thing to do, not necessarily because they would lead to increased profits at any cost. This it not to say that Google has always adhered to this ideology, but it has left it wide open to be branded hypocritical when it appears to contravene it.

But it’s not even as easy as criticising Google for breaching its own moral code. In Google’s defence, there is a compelling business imperative that drove it to comply with China’s restrictive censorship laws. The old drug dealer argument raises its head: if Google didn’t go in there, some other search company would have done so. This doesn’t make it ‘right’ in the moral sense, but economic Darwinism says that only the most competitive business survive. Had Google not taken the opportunity, it would have weakened its business. It also would have been negligent in its responsibilities towards its shareholders, who expect a return from their investment.

Through all these arguments, I can see why people would not want Google to comply with a censorship regime that they themselves wouldn’t tolerate having applied to them. But I can also see why Google would have taken the opportunity to get into the incredibly lucrative market in China. At the end of the day, Google is not really to blame. Instead we need to evaluate the way we do business, and weigh up the relative importance of economic prosperity compared to our moral convictions. Many investment funds and shareholders have been doing just this, such as what happened on December 22 last year.

In association with the Reporters Sans Frontières, 28 investment groups, representing over US$22 billion in assets, issued a joint statement supporting the freedom of expression on the Internet. Sure, US$22 billion is only a drop in the ocean, but it's by no means insignificant. So if your moral convictions are strong enough to tip the balance against financial concerns, then there is a recourse.

Don't invest with Google. Invest with an ethical fund that supports your convictions, and make a statement with your wallet.


Like this Article ?

http://www.pcauthority.com.au/

PC Authority is jam-packed with the latest products. Product reviews are in-depth and everything is comprehensively and objectively evaluated in our Labs, using the most respected and reliable testing methodology available.

Every issue reveals new ways of working on solutions to tricky problems. Working with some of the most respected writers, PC Authority goes to great depth with how-tos, professional advice, tutorials and guides helping you get the most out of your technology.

Interested in subscribing http://www.pcauthority.com.au/subscribe.aspx


How would you rate the quality of this article?
1 2 3 4 5
Poor Excellent
Add comment
Comments
  • Comment #1 (Posted by an unknown user)
    Rating
    great
     
  • Comment #2 (Posted by Paul)
    Rating
    Please come out and say sanction when you mean sanction.
    If you want the investors of the world to sanction Google to stop them bowing to China's local laws, say so. Following this logic Google shouldn't be required to bow to US laws, or any other laws it doesn't like. WRONG!!!. I hope you don't seriously think that you can change the censorship laws in China (don't start me on the movie censorship in US) by trying to make Google leave.
    You are trying to start a political fight with Google as the punching bag.
    *sigh*

     
  • Comment #3 (Posted by an unknown user)
    Rating
    have you ever been a CEO of any company that has tried to help the world in any way?
    talk is cheap. actions matter. when you have taken action yourself at the same size as the google guys, THEN you may be able to offer some insight that glows with wisdom. this article comes across like a dead branch - brittle and weak, because of lack of experience.
     
  • Comment #4 (Posted by Zoran Bulic)
    Rating
    That Chinese Communist Party (CCP) is evil is beyond doubt. The CCP wants to rule the Chinese peple forever. Not through fair elections but by imprisoning and killing anyone who opposes it. All of Chinese media is tightly controlled by the CCP. In this way the CCP forever glorifies itself and through lies and fabrications decieves the Chinese people into beliveing that without the CCP they would be much worse off. Whether a company dealing with CCP is also evil, by assosiation, depends on whether that company allows itself to be moraly corrupted by the evil CCP. In it's dealings with the CCP Google has sold it's integrity.It sold it way too cheap!
     
Submit Comment