To subscribe, click here.

Learn about
RSS subscriptions.



Advanced Search
Windows Vista: The Inside Story
By Nick Clayton | Published  7/Feb/2007 | | Rating:
Page 1 / 3

Windows Vista: The Inside Story

How an unexpected setback brought about a new era for your PC – and for Microsoft.

The road to the final release of Windows Vista has not always been a smooth one. The lowest point came when the head of Windows development, Jim Allchin – probably Bill Gates’ most trusted senior lieutenant at Microsoft – told him that development on the successor to Windows XP had effectively ground to a halt. Gates didn’t know whether to be furious or just traumatised. In a later interview published in the Wall Street Journal, Allchin says he told Gates, “It’s not going to work”. Even coming from the man who’s seen by many as the guiding father of Windows, Gates found the news hard to believe.

 

The weather matched the fevered behind-the-scenes activity. In Microsoft’s normally-temperate home city of Seattle, throughout July and August 2004 heatwaves followed muggy spells as Gates argued that the project just needed more time. Behind closed doors, he also held conversations with senior software architects, but in the end Gates agreed on the need to start building the new operating system from scratch. It was the most traumatic point in the development of Longhorn, the codename for the program that was eventually to become Windows Vista, and it changed the way that Microsoft operates. In short, software development became a team game rather than a somewhat chaotic competition between programmers.

Behind the scenes

Visitors to the company’s Redmond Campus generally come away with a feeling of almost unnatural order. Even the grass between the buildings seems controlled to the point where it maintains a uniform height without a lawnmower in sight. But underneath the apparently regimented academic exterior was often barely organised chaos. The celebration of this culture peaked in an internal Microsoft documentary, which portrayed software engineers as heroes as they battled to beat seemingly impossible odds to get Windows XP out on time.

By the time Windows XP did make it out of the door in October 2001, Allchin’s mind was on other things – in May of that year work had started on Longhorn. This was expected to follow the trajectory that had worked so successfully for Microsoft, to the point where its operating systems run well over 90 per cent of the world’s personal computers. The basis of Microsoft’s popularity is ‘bundling’. Without it an operating system is a vital, but not hugely interesting, piece of software, which manages the hardware and software resources of a computer, such as controlling input and output devices, allocating memory and managing files. There’s never been a firm definition that puts a boundary on what can be included, but before Windows came along you couldn’t have much fun with an operating system on its own. Now it’s taken for granted that the operating system will be bundled with a host of functions and programs, such as games, a web browser, a media player, security software and rudimentary word processing.


Comments
  • Comment #1 (Posted by John Lewis)
    Rating
    Windows Vista may well be wonderfull - except if you are attempting to connect to wireless internet through Bigpond, OptusNet or OZEMail who don't support it ! Microsoft's "help" desk was also useless as usual !
     
  • Comment #2 (Posted by an unknown user)
    Rating
    Wkat a load of rubbish - MS propaganda
     
  • Comment #3 (Posted by Paul Reynolds)
    Rating
    Propaganda & rubbish! When have Microsoft EVER given a damn about backwards compatibility? Apple ditched most things when OS X started because it was genuinely totally different from previous systems, something else Microsoft can never claim to have produced. The WOW ends now!
     
  • Comment #4 (Posted by craig)
    Rating
    http://www.ubuntu.com/
     
  • Comment #5 (Posted by George Embrey)
    Rating
    I have worked in this industry since 1976, and I've heard just about every industry lie, (you know, the Spin created by marketing people...), ever told about Software...

    1. There were several truths told in this article... Microsoft did use Chaos as their prefered software development methodology.

    2. Bill Gates was annoyed when WindowsFS was removed from Vista.

    As for the comments on Apple's OSX. Apple had a New UNIX based operating System which could run on multiple Hardware platforms and would have to completely re-write their old applications in order to have them run on OSX. Legacy support was not viable.

    Apple had also enabled their users to install applications and benefit from the world's largest software development community "Open Source" ... any Linux Applications, and 99.999% of BSD Unix Applications run very nicely on Apple OSX.

    In the two internal technical review processes which I have performed on Microsoft's Windows Vista for use in a business / enterprise environment, the verdict has been:

    1. Too Expensive in terms of Hardware requirements, software upgrades required. - POOR BACKWARD COMPATABILITY - (Sales opportunity for more Microsoft Office).

    2. Vastly increased network traffic causing network slowdowns, way too much tweaking required to correct this. For the average company this means retraining of IT Staff and compared with other OS's, ( Linux, Apple OSX, Unix ... ) a big learning curve for little benefit.

    3. Lack of Drivers for "Legacy" equipment like ADSL Modems and other equipment viewed as necessary today. Asl Telstra, Optus and Oz-email subscribers.

    In summary Windows Vista is like a Dog with one leg, it looks pretty, is a pitty and sadly can't do much in a practical sense except bark and drop fleas.

    If you want a great operating system which is stable, reliable and robust Download "MEPIS" Linux from http://www.mepis.com

    :-)
     
  • Comment #6 (Posted by Stephen Gentle)
    Rating
    Linux and Mac OS are the way to go. Microsoft have spent five years and billions of dollars, but they have come up with the amount of features a Linux distribution comes up with in six months.

    Also, Microsoft have copied so much from Mac OS X (ie. the shiny interface, Spotlight etc..), but they have failed to copy the one thing that would actually make Windows a good operating system: Switching to a UNIX kernel and ditching the old code. Vista still has things (like the add font dialogue) left over from Windows 3.1 for crying out loud!
     
  • Comment #7 (Posted by Stephen Gentle)
    Rating
    Another thing. Microsoft in my opinion has cared TOO much about backwards compatibility. They have said that they even keep bugs in the code that old programs relied on for the sake of compatibility. Who really cares if a Windows 95 application doesn't work any more?
     
  • Comment #8 (Posted by Aquataine)
    Rating
    Windows, Apple, Linux... Why can't they're be an perating system that runs all my games OLD and NEW, has the security of linux, the design and feel of windows and user friendlyness of Apple... Windows is too hackable, Linux requires to much to get my head around and is useless for the users i support no mater the platform, Mac OS Sb1Ts me to no end, pardon my language but i can't build my own pc and install Mac OS on it... i used to bring my Windows laptop from home with Xp and it had more grunt than the "suposed to be Brand new and fastest" mac's out at the time... Maybe i want too much? what i'd like is an os i can put on my PC, can run EVERYthing i currently run including games on my pc, and hopefuly in linux based and secure. if there is something out there i'd LOVE to know...
     
  • Comment #9 (Posted by NOTT Elling)
    Rating
    People are very quick to complain. This is an excellent product from Microsoft. The O/S may be suited to newer computers, but how long will a coffee machine last? Life expectency for a PC is 3 yrs.
    Spend some money. get yourself a new PC, with Vista Pre-installed. That way it is guarenteed to work on the PC side. The fact that ISP and Broadband uppliers are behind the ball, is there own fault. Mine works fine. Hey! why don't you use your old PC as the Gateway machine and do your thing for the environment?
     
  • Comment #10 (Posted by Andrew)
    Rating
    A new era for my PC? You mean Linux?

    Seriously, I switched about two years ago to get all the features that Microsoft are only just releasing. Pathetic...
     
  • Comment #11 (Posted by Brett)
    Rating
    Well, I've sen 24622 articles that criticise Vista, and this must be the first one to say positive things.

    Either the other articles are all wrong or this came straight out of the spin-department at a certain company based in Redmond WA
     
  • Comment #12 (Posted by Duarding)
    Rating
    Yes, most of you who criticize Vista are just ants screaming out loud but noone can't hear or even feel the bite. Keep all your MacOS, Linux, or whatever - it's a 'mass-users' game - still MS - Sorry it's way too friendly to me that I can't just abondon it - yeh... longing for the Vista. To those Unix users - I don't think you still carry your SunSparcs with those 1 ton heavy monitors - I suffered back pain carrying that monster:)
     
  • Comment #13 (Posted by Karen)
    Rating
    My concern is that I have a few elderly relatives in their sevenites and eighties who can only just work Windows XP. Windows Vista is so different that it is toally confusing to them. I don't think an operating system should be so different that the learning curve is too difficult for them. All ages use the internet now. I am very hesitant to upgrade to Vista whilst I am still helping my relatives with their fairly recent computers and Windows XP.
     
Submit Comment