For a free RSS subscription, click here.

Learn more.

Enter your email address to receive Netregistry News in your inbox:

Delivered by FeedBurner



Advanced Search
Windows Vista: The Inside Story
By Nick Clayton | Published  7/Feb/2007 | | Rating:
Page 3 / 3

New ways of working

Although to Microsoft outsiders development appeared to be continuing as normal – if somewhat slowly – behind the scenes there were some problems. Some engineers were describing Longhorn as ‘Cairo.NET’, in reference to an enormous 1990s project that never saw the light of day, although most of its elements did surface later in Windows 95 and Windows NT. To get Longhorn back on track, developers were pulled in from Windows Server 2003 and a more structured way of working was introduced. Some employees weren’t happy and even Bill Gates reportedly resisted the changes, which were seen as liable to stifle creativity.

“It was all just, ‘Hey, bless this process’, which I was unwilling to do,” Gates later told the Wall Street Journal. “They’re just talking about process and I’m frustrated we’re not talking about how the teams are responding to it.” His fears seemed justified when the Longhorn Developer Preview was handed out to developers in April 2005. What they saw seemed to be a step back towards Windows XP.

Looking good

But then in July that same year came the name change to Windows Vista and the first beta test. It looked completely different. In came virtual folders, new high-resolution icons, new search and Windows Explorer interfaces. Under the skin were the promised new networking and audio stacks, parental controls, and a working build of .NET Framework 3.0.

A series of new builds started to appear under the banner Community Technology Preview. Most contained small changes to tidy up minor problems, but some demonstrated substantial developments. The Windows Sidebar reappeared and Microsoft Gadgets was introduced. Then came the public release of Windows Vista Beta 2, which was probably the largest software download event in history, nearly caused a disaster. “If we increased our bandwidth any further,” a Microsoft representative said at the time “there’s a possibility of taking down the internet…” At the same time, Microsoft was looking to get genuinely demanding feedback, none greater than when it sponsored and invited hackers to test their skills at August’s Black Hat conference in Las Vegas.

Almost inevitably, a headline from the event read: “Vista hacked at Black Hat.” What actually happened was a Polish researcher managed to insert malicious code to bypass the Windows Vista security – but she’d only done it after User Account Protection had been switched off. This lead some to suggest that this was akin to ‘hiding’ a house key under the doormat, then complaining the building’s security was inadequate when it got broken into. Demonstrations like these are more than just a marketing ploy. The unprecedented scale of testing has led to Microsoft making numerous changes to Windows Vista, anything from improvements in speed and performance to the inclusion of a check box that enables users to switch off the startup tune.

By the end of August 2006, Windows Vista had reached Release Candidate 1, with nearly all the features nailed down and only a few last tweaks remaining. The final moment occurs when Windows Vista “goes gold” and is released to the world’s manufacturing plants for the discs to be pressed in their millions.

Like This Article?

Windows Vista - The Official Magazine is a different kind of technology magazine. Every month we show you how to take control of Windows Vista to make your PC more powerful, productive - and fun! There's no nerdspeak and complicated jargon, just great ideas and clear tutorials to help you get the most out of Windows Vista and turn your PC into the hub of your digital life. And because it is the only Vista magazine in Australia produced with Microsoft's official support, you can be sure you're getting the right advice. For more information on the magazine and to subscribe, visit www.vistamag.com.au

Want to subscribe?


How would you rate the quality of this article?
1 2 3 4 5
Poor Excellent
Add comment
Comments
  • Comment #1 (Posted by John Lewis)
    Rating
    Windows Vista may well be wonderfull - except if you are attempting to connect to wireless internet through Bigpond, OptusNet or OZEMail who don't support it ! Microsoft's "help" desk was also useless as usual !
     
  • Comment #2 (Posted by an unknown user)
    Rating
    Wkat a load of rubbish - MS propaganda
     
  • Comment #3 (Posted by Paul Reynolds)
    Rating
    Propaganda & rubbish! When have Microsoft EVER given a damn about backwards compatibility? Apple ditched most things when OS X started because it was genuinely totally different from previous systems, something else Microsoft can never claim to have produced. The WOW ends now!
     
  • Comment #4 (Posted by craig)
    Rating
    http://www.ubuntu.com/
     
  • Comment #5 (Posted by George Embrey)
    Rating
    I have worked in this industry since 1976, and I've heard just about every industry lie, (you know, the Spin created by marketing people...), ever told about Software...

    1. There were several truths told in this article... Microsoft did use Chaos as their prefered software development methodology.

    2. Bill Gates was annoyed when WindowsFS was removed from Vista.

    As for the comments on Apple's OSX. Apple had a New UNIX based operating System which could run on multiple Hardware platforms and would have to completely re-write their old applications in order to have them run on OSX. Legacy support was not viable.

    Apple had also enabled their users to install applications and benefit from the world's largest software development community "Open Source" ... any Linux Applications, and 99.999% of BSD Unix Applications run very nicely on Apple OSX.

    In the two internal technical review processes which I have performed on Microsoft's Windows Vista for use in a business / enterprise environment, the verdict has been:

    1. Too Expensive in terms of Hardware requirements, software upgrades required. - POOR BACKWARD COMPATABILITY - (Sales opportunity for more Microsoft Office).

    2. Vastly increased network traffic causing network slowdowns, way too much tweaking required to correct this. For the average company this means retraining of IT Staff and compared with other OS's, ( Linux, Apple OSX, Unix ... ) a big learning curve for little benefit.

    3. Lack of Drivers for "Legacy" equipment like ADSL Modems and other equipment viewed as necessary today. Asl Telstra, Optus and Oz-email subscribers.

    In summary Windows Vista is like a Dog with one leg, it looks pretty, is a pitty and sadly can't do much in a practical sense except bark and drop fleas.

    If you want a great operating system which is stable, reliable and robust Download "MEPIS" Linux from http://www.mepis.com

    :-)
     
  • Comment #6 (Posted by Stephen Gentle)
    Rating
    Linux and Mac OS are the way to go. Microsoft have spent five years and billions of dollars, but they have come up with the amount of features a Linux distribution comes up with in six months.

    Also, Microsoft have copied so much from Mac OS X (ie. the shiny interface, Spotlight etc..), but they have failed to copy the one thing that would actually make Windows a good operating system: Switching to a UNIX kernel and ditching the old code. Vista still has things (like the add font dialogue) left over from Windows 3.1 for crying out loud!
     
  • Comment #7 (Posted by Stephen Gentle)
    Rating
    Another thing. Microsoft in my opinion has cared TOO much about backwards compatibility. They have said that they even keep bugs in the code that old programs relied on for the sake of compatibility. Who really cares if a Windows 95 application doesn't work any more?
     
  • Comment #8 (Posted by Aquataine)
    Rating
    Windows, Apple, Linux... Why can't they're be an perating system that runs all my games OLD and NEW, has the security of linux, the design and feel of windows and user friendlyness of Apple... Windows is too hackable, Linux requires to much to get my head around and is useless for the users i support no mater the platform, Mac OS Sb1Ts me to no end, pardon my language but i can't build my own pc and install Mac OS on it... i used to bring my Windows laptop from home with Xp and it had more grunt than the "suposed to be Brand new and fastest" mac's out at the time... Maybe i want too much? what i'd like is an os i can put on my PC, can run EVERYthing i currently run including games on my pc, and hopefuly in linux based and secure. if there is something out there i'd LOVE to know...
     
  • Comment #9 (Posted by NOTT Elling)
    Rating
    People are very quick to complain. This is an excellent product from Microsoft. The O/S may be suited to newer computers, but how long will a coffee machine last? Life expectency for a PC is 3 yrs.
    Spend some money. get yourself a new PC, with Vista Pre-installed. That way it is guarenteed to work on the PC side. The fact that ISP and Broadband uppliers are behind the ball, is there own fault. Mine works fine. Hey! why don't you use your old PC as the Gateway machine and do your thing for the environment?
     
  • Comment #10 (Posted by Andrew)
    Rating
    A new era for my PC? You mean Linux?

    Seriously, I switched about two years ago to get all the features that Microsoft are only just releasing. Pathetic...
     
  • Comment #11 (Posted by Brett)
    Rating
    Well, I've sen 24622 articles that criticise Vista, and this must be the first one to say positive things.

    Either the other articles are all wrong or this came straight out of the spin-department at a certain company based in Redmond WA
     
  • Comment #12 (Posted by Duarding)
    Rating
    Yes, most of you who criticize Vista are just ants screaming out loud but noone can't hear or even feel the bite. Keep all your MacOS, Linux, or whatever - it's a 'mass-users' game - still MS - Sorry it's way too friendly to me that I can't just abondon it - yeh... longing for the Vista. To those Unix users - I don't think you still carry your SunSparcs with those 1 ton heavy monitors - I suffered back pain carrying that monster:)
     
  • Comment #13 (Posted by Karen)
    Rating
    My concern is that I have a few elderly relatives in their sevenites and eighties who can only just work Windows XP. Windows Vista is so different that it is toally confusing to them. I don't think an operating system should be so different that the learning curve is too difficult for them. All ages use the internet now. I am very hesitant to upgrade to Vista whilst I am still helping my relatives with their fairly recent computers and Windows XP.
     
Submit Comment